In their article entitled ‘Nikah of Lady Umme Kulthum (sa),’ Answering-Ansar claims that Hishām ibn Sālim was a non-Shī`ī person of corrupt belief and an unreliable narrator. In this piece of writing, readers will witness that the Answering-Ansar team does not even spare Shī`ī scholars and narrators when it comes to distorting facts and misleading innocent Muslims.

The Answering-Ansar team has quoted a narration from Sunnī texts that supposedly proves the invalidity of folding hands during prayers according to them. However, they have mistranslated the narration, coming up with a translation that neither the Arabic language nor a sane mind can accept, and further misquoted another text to make the narration appear supportive of their view.

This article demonstrates the dissimulative approach that has been long practiced by Shī`ī Ithnā’ `Asharī scholars and imitated by their following propagandists. Answering-Ansar claims that Ibn A`tham is “one of the pioneer reliable Sunni historians.” The truth is shown in this article, while the deception and mendaciousness of the renowned Ithnā’ `Asharī scholar Nūr Allāh al-Tustarī are also exposed.

Another short piece of writing that reveals Answering-Ansar’s misquotation and distortion of Sunnī texts, and an example of how, when the cited references on Answering-Ansar are actually checked, the picture drawn from the quoted texts turns out to be completely opposite. The misquoted works this time are Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr and al-Durr al-Manthūr.

The Answering-Ansar team often cites a historical work known as ‘Waq`at Şiffīn’ in their articles, declaring it to be one of the “esteemed Sunni works.” This article exposes this deception of Answering-Ansar and shows that the author of this alleged Sunnī text is actually an extremist Shī`ī.

When the Answering-Ansar team was faced with Sunnī objections pertaining to al-Nūrī al-Ţabarsī and his belief in the distortion of the Holy Qur’ān that he tried to prove in his Faşl al-Khiţāb, they deceptively declared him a “deviant individual” who does not represent the Shī`a. This study shows how the actual view of the Shī`a about al-Nūrī is quite different from what Answering-Ansar is leading its readers to believe, while also exposing the lies of al-Sayyid Şādiq al-Shīrāzī and Mulla Asgharali Jaffer concerning the issue.

The Answering-Ansar team boldly quotes the late Muĥammad Abū Zahra criticizing a Sunnī scholar, al-Nawawī, and accusing him of dishonesty due to his interpretation of a narration in their article ‘Mu'awiya.’ This piece shows the truth about it. [Time Expired; Answering-Ansar failed the challenge]

A short exposition that shows how verifying the quotes from Sunnī and Shī`ī texts referenced by the Answering-Ansar team reveals their distortion and misquotation of Islamic texts, and the Ithnā’ `Asharī scholars and propagandists’ outright fabricating of material to promote their notions and mislead unwary Muslims.